When Joint Force Commanders (JFCs) consider operations in different types of Areas of Operations (AOs), which combination is typically chosen?

The choice of linear operations in contiguous Areas of Operations (AOs) is often preferred by Joint Force Commanders (JFCs) due to the tactical advantages it provides. Linear operations facilitate easier communication and control over forces by establishing a clear front. This setup allows for coordinated movements and engagements against an adversary, as all units are working in proximity to each other, which enhances operational effectiveness and support.

Contiguous AOs mean that the areas of operations of different components overlap or touch, making it easier to integrate efforts. This is significant for joint and combined operations where synchronization is critical. When JFCs execute linear operations in this environment, the focus can be on a straightforward approach to maneuver warfare, allowing for joint efforts to exploit the enemy's weaknesses effectively.

Additionally, linear operations can be critical in achieving and maintaining momentum during engagements. They support the concept of massing forces, which is essential for overwhelming the enemy and securing strategic objectives quickly. This method is integral in traditional and hybrid warfare scenarios where the boundaries and flow of combat must be exactly managed.

In contrast, nonlinear operations, while they have their advantages in some scenarios, can complicate the command and control aspects due to dispersed engagement and potential difficulties in communication.